See our website at www.samuelson-law.com

Welcome to my blog. I use it primarily to publish my materials from programs I present before the American Bar Association, the American College of Real Estate Lawyers, the American Inns of Court, the District of Columbia Bar, the Maryland State Bar Association, the Harvard Business School Club of Washington, D.C., and other organizations. I would love to receive any questions, comments, criticisms and suggestions you may have on any of these topics. Please check my law firm’s website, at www.samuelson-law.com , and contact me.

Please note the Disclaimers , Privacy Policy, and Terms of Use of this Blog governing all of the articles and comments set forth in this Blog. In addition, please note the following:

  1. All articles contained in this Blog are only as of their respective dates. None of them has been updated since then. The reader is urged to supplement all of those materials.
  2. Particular facts and circumstances, and changes of law or fact, may affect the statements in the articles in this Blog.
Published on:

Yes, “Bad Boy” Guaranties Against Bankruptcy are Enforceable

Many real estate developers have signed so-called “bad boy” clauses personally guaranteeing the re-payment of all or part of a mortgage, made to a single asset entity as the borrower, if that entity files bankruptcy (or, even under some clauses, is placed in an involuntary bankruptcy). In Bank of America, N.A., et. al. v. Lightstone Holdings, LLC, et. al., Index No. 601853/09, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, recently enforced one such clause dealing with a voluntary bankruptcy of the mortgagor.


However, the Court’s decision does not expressly address such issues as: (a) whether such a clause would be deemed an ipso facto one in a personal bankruptcy of the developer himself/herself, especially in the case of a voluntary bankruptcy of the entity; (b) whether the entity’s bankruptcy would have to be completed before the amount of the damages could be determined against the developer; (c) the validity of such a clause if it is not signed by the developer separately as a personal undertaking; or (d) the usual issues as to consideration.